10 resources found

This document synthesizes evidence-based strategies for adapting western North American forests to the dual threats of climate change and uncharacteristic wildfires. The authors argue that over a century of fire exclusion has replaced historical, fire-resilient mosaics with dense, fuel-heavy landscapes that are increasingly vulnerable to high-severity, stand-replacing fires. To address this crisis, the authors advocate for a shift from aggressive suppression toward proactive management, including the strategic use of mechanical thinning and prescribed burning. This resource evaluates ten common questions that often cause public or scientific disagreement, such as the efficacy of treatments under extreme fire weather and the necessity of managing forests beyond the wildland urban interface.

This technical report introduces Landscape Fire Management as a crucial, integrated approach to addressing escalating wildfire risks while restoring ecosystem health. LFM is presented as a paradigm shift, moving beyond localized efforts to encompass broader landscapes by coordinating various land management activities and setting complementary wildland fire objectives across different land-use zones. The document outlines six core principles for effective LFM practice: defining the landscape, understanding current and future conditions, assessing risks to values, setting cohesive objectives, coordinating interventions, and continuously learning through adaptive management. This report aims to guide diverse land managers in British Columbia towards a more resilient coexistence with fire by detailing strategies like fuel breaks, fire-tolerant stands, and managing fuel loads.

This paper examines how community forests in British Columbia, Canada, are transforming wildfire governance by shifting away from traditional, centralized, and reactive approaches toward proactive, locally-driven management. The authors highlight that CFs, which are long-term forest tenures managed by Indigenous and/or local communities, act as local leaders in mitigating wildfire risk. Their success hinges on crucial factors such as financial and social capacity, particularly the ability to build trust and strong relationships with both community members and government agencies. Despite persistent challenges, the study concludes that CFs are a critical form of local wildfire governance, effectively implementing diverse strategies and fostering a fire lens in forest management to enhance wildfire resilience across various scales.

This paper analyzes the record-breaking 2023 wildfires in British Columbia, detailing their significant ecological and social impacts, which are seen as the result of a century of altered relationships with fire intensified by climate change. The authors argue for an urgent transformative shift towards coexisting with wildfire, moving beyond suppression to embrace its ecological role and Indigenous stewardship practices. The paper proposes six interrelated strategies to achieve this coexistence: diversifying wildfire response, increasing suppression capacity, mitigating community risk, implementing landscape fire management, transforming wildfire governance, and strengthening expertise. This paper emphasizes the need for a holistic, all-of-society approach involving policy changes, sustained funding, and collaboration to build resilience against future extreme wildfires.

This document outlines the critical need to braid Indigenous Knowledge and Western Science to create climate-adapted forests in the United States. A primary theme is the historical impact of Euro-American colonization, fire exclusion, and settler colonialism on North American forest ecosystems, leading to the loss of Indigenous stewardship and creating dense, fire-maladapted landscapes highly vulnerable to severe wildfires and climate change stressors. The text defines IK as an invaluable, multi-generational body of systemic knowledge and cultural practices emphasizing kinship with nature and reciprocity, contrasting it with the empirical and objective approach of WS.

This paper investigates the differential ecological impacts of an extreme 2017 wildfire versus ongoing prescribed burns in Waterton Lakes National Park, AB. The core objective is to understand how reintroducing historical land-use processes, particularly through Traditional Ecological Knowledge, can enhance ecosystem resilience against modern stressors like climate change and invasive species. The study focuses on the Kenow wildfire's high-severity effects on a native-grass prairie compared to lower-severity prescribed burns, suggesting that while prescribed burning is beneficial, incorporating the full historical eco-cultural context, including the role of free-ranging bison and late-season Indigenous burning practices, is crucial for effective ecological restoration. The authors conclude that extreme disturbance is not necessarily catastrophic and that combining TEK with adaptive co-management can create landscapes more resilient to pervasive change.

This paper introduces walking on two legs, an Indigenous framework for ecosystem restoration and reconciliation in fire-adapted landscapes, particularly in Western Canada. The concept advocates for balancing Indigenous knowledges with Western scientific knowledge, ensuring that Indigenous perspectives and stewardship ethics guide the interconnected processes of restoration and reconciliation. The authors argue that genuine reconciliation requires Indigenous-led restoration of lands, knowledges, and cultures, moving beyond simply integrating Indigenous knowledge into existing Western frameworks. This approach aims to rebuild respectful relationships between people and the land, addressing the legacies of colonialism and revitalizing Indigenous practices like fire stewardship.

This paper highlights the crucial role of boundary spanners in addressing the escalating challenge of wildfires in Western Canada. These individuals and organizations bridge critical gaps, spanning different knowledge systems, organizations, and geographical areas, to foster collaboration and implement proactive fire management strategies, such as cultural and prescribed burning. The authors emphasize that despite the vital work of boundary spanners in building trust, sharing knowledge, and developing capacity, their contributions are often undervalued and lack sufficient institutional support. The piece concludes by asserting the urgent need for dedicated investment in boundary spanning roles to effectively integrate diverse expertise and facilitate collaborative, equitable solutions for wildfire management.

This document introduces the Mitigating Wildfire Initiative, an effort to address catastrophic wildfires in British Columbia through dialogue and collaboration among diverse groups, including Indigenous Peoples and local communities. The MWI has four key objectives: strengthening relationships, improving understanding of wildfire issues, creating a shared agenda for mitigation, and achieving real-world impact. The document delves into the complex concept of resilience in the context of wildfire, differentiating between ecological, social, and social-ecological perspectives, and emphasizes the importance of place-based and context-specific discussions for effective strategies. Finally, it outlines five interconnected categories of progress being made toward wildfire resilience in BC including planning, operations, networking, research and knowledge generation, and public engagement, highlighting the need for an all-of-society approach and proactive, dynamic management.

This paper examines the critical role of cultural burning practiced by Indigenous Peoples in managing ecosystems and reducing wildfire risks. Despite its ecological benefits and long history, the paper highlights significant barriers hindering the resurgence of Indigenous fire stewardship, including legal and governance obstacles, lack of access to training and accreditation, liability and insurance issues, and insufficient resources. The authors argue for the necessity of decolonizing wildfire management by recognizing Indigenous knowledge systems, respecting Indigenous governance, and creating pathways for Indigenous-led fire stewardship to ensure more effective and socially just coexistence with fire in Canada. The paper calls for concrete actions to support and empower Indigenous communities in leading fire management on their territories.