11 resources found

This paper reviews the effectiveness of stand-level fuel reduction treatments in Canadian boreal conifer forests, specifically focusing on black spruce, jack pine, and lodgepole pine. These treatments, which involve thinning trees, pruning lower branches, and removing understory vegetation, aim to mitigate the risk of fast-spreading, high-intensity crown fires that are naturally prevalent in these ecosystems. While these fuel treatments generally reduce modeled and observed fire behavior under low to moderate fire weather, evidence suggests they become ineffective under very high or extreme fire conditions, especially when combined with high surface fuel loads and the relatively short stature of boreal conifers. The authors highlight the need for further research into managing surface fuel loads, exploring alternative fuel configurations, and integrating these treatments with broader fire suppression strategies.

This paper examines how community forests in British Columbia, Canada, are transforming wildfire governance by shifting away from traditional, centralized, and reactive approaches toward proactive, locally-driven management. The authors highlight that CFs, which are long-term forest tenures managed by Indigenous and/or local communities, act as local leaders in mitigating wildfire risk. Their success hinges on crucial factors such as financial and social capacity, particularly the ability to build trust and strong relationships with both community members and government agencies. Despite persistent challenges, the study concludes that CFs are a critical form of local wildfire governance, effectively implementing diverse strategies and fostering a fire lens in forest management to enhance wildfire resilience across various scales.

This paper addresses the critical need for improved understanding of the long-term effectiveness of fuel reduction treatments in dry, fire-prone forests of western North America. The authors highlight that current knowledge limitations lead to inefficient maintenance and inaccurate wildfire forecasting. They propose six key research opportunities designed to refine our grasp of how long treatments remain effective. These opportunities include evaluating longevity within specific management goals, referencing desired ecological conditions, accounting for natural forest variability, exploring internal treatment factors, increasing post-treatment sampling frequency, and incorporating spatial heterogeneity into analyses. The paper aims to foster climate-adaptive management that enhances dry forest resilience to wildfire through more efficient and informed treatment strategies.

This paper investigates the effectiveness of various fire management treatments on western U. S. coniferous forests, which have become more susceptible to severe wildfires due to a century of fire exclusion and altered land use. Researchers analyzed the impacts of mechanical thinning, prescribed burning, and a combination of both across six diverse sites. The study found that mechanical thinning combined with prescribed fire was the most effective strategy for significantly reducing surface fuel loads, decreasing the likelihood of severe crown fires, and lowering predicted tree mortality. While mechanical-only treatments were less consistent, they were effective when whole-tree harvesting systems were used, minimizing residual surface fuels.

This paper analyzes the record-breaking 2023 wildfires in British Columbia, detailing their significant ecological and social impacts, which are seen as the result of a century of altered relationships with fire intensified by climate change. The authors argue for an urgent transformative shift towards coexisting with wildfire, moving beyond suppression to embrace its ecological role and Indigenous stewardship practices. The paper proposes six interrelated strategies to achieve this coexistence: diversifying wildfire response, increasing suppression capacity, mitigating community risk, implementing landscape fire management, transforming wildfire governance, and strengthening expertise. This paper emphasizes the need for a holistic, all-of-society approach involving policy changes, sustained funding, and collaboration to build resilience against future extreme wildfires.

This paper investigates the differential ecological impacts of an extreme 2017 wildfire versus ongoing prescribed burns in Waterton Lakes National Park, AB. The core objective is to understand how reintroducing historical land-use processes, particularly through Traditional Ecological Knowledge, can enhance ecosystem resilience against modern stressors like climate change and invasive species. The study focuses on the Kenow wildfire's high-severity effects on a native-grass prairie compared to lower-severity prescribed burns, suggesting that while prescribed burning is beneficial, incorporating the full historical eco-cultural context, including the role of free-ranging bison and late-season Indigenous burning practices, is crucial for effective ecological restoration. The authors conclude that extreme disturbance is not necessarily catastrophic and that combining TEK with adaptive co-management can create landscapes more resilient to pervasive change.

This paper introduces walking on two legs, an Indigenous framework for ecosystem restoration and reconciliation in fire-adapted landscapes, particularly in Western Canada. The concept advocates for balancing Indigenous knowledges with Western scientific knowledge, ensuring that Indigenous perspectives and stewardship ethics guide the interconnected processes of restoration and reconciliation. The authors argue that genuine reconciliation requires Indigenous-led restoration of lands, knowledges, and cultures, moving beyond simply integrating Indigenous knowledge into existing Western frameworks. This approach aims to rebuild respectful relationships between people and the land, addressing the legacies of colonialism and revitalizing Indigenous practices like fire stewardship.

This paper highlights the crucial role of boundary spanners in addressing the escalating challenge of wildfires in Western Canada. These individuals and organizations bridge critical gaps, spanning different knowledge systems, organizations, and geographical areas, to foster collaboration and implement proactive fire management strategies, such as cultural and prescribed burning. The authors emphasize that despite the vital work of boundary spanners in building trust, sharing knowledge, and developing capacity, their contributions are often undervalued and lack sufficient institutional support. The piece concludes by asserting the urgent need for dedicated investment in boundary spanning roles to effectively integrate diverse expertise and facilitate collaborative, equitable solutions for wildfire management.

This paper presents the long-term ecological effects of forest fuel and restoration treatments from the ongoing national Fire and Fire Surrogate study, analyzing data collected over approximately 20 years across four diverse sites in the Western and Eastern United States. The central goal of the original FFS study was to evaluate how mechanical treatments and prescribed fire impact forest ecosystems by reducing fire hazard, promoting desirable fire-adapted species, and improving understory diversity. Key findings reveal that the most effective treatment varies significantly by region: mechanical treatments combined with fire yielded better long-term outcomes in Western pine-dominated forests, while prescribed burning alone proved more beneficial in Eastern hardwood-dominated forests. The authors conclude that to maintain these desirable conditions and achieve long-term resilience, treatments must be adapted to the specific ecosystem and followed up with repeated applications.

This paper investigates the effectiveness of different forest fuel treatments, such as thinning and prescribed burning, in reducing the severity of subsequent wildfires. Leveraging a unique 1200-hectare experiment that was later impacted by a significant wildfire, the authors compared various treatment approaches, including thin-only, burn-only, and a combination of both, against an untreated control. Their analysis of fire severity metrics, considering pre-fire fuel conditions and fire weather, provides strong evidence that proactive fuel management, especially combining thinning and burning, significantly mitigates wildfire intensity and damage to trees, even decades after the treatments were implemented and under a range of weather conditions. The study supports the continued use of these treatments as valuable tools for forest restoration and enhancing resilience to increasingly severe wildfires.

This paper examines the critical role of cultural burning practiced by Indigenous Peoples in managing ecosystems and reducing wildfire risks. Despite its ecological benefits and long history, the paper highlights significant barriers hindering the resurgence of Indigenous fire stewardship, including legal and governance obstacles, lack of access to training and accreditation, liability and insurance issues, and insufficient resources. The authors argue for the necessity of decolonizing wildfire management by recognizing Indigenous knowledge systems, respecting Indigenous governance, and creating pathways for Indigenous-led fire stewardship to ensure more effective and socially just coexistence with fire in Canada. The paper calls for concrete actions to support and empower Indigenous communities in leading fire management on their territories.