2 resources found

This paper investigates the differential ecological impacts of an extreme 2017 wildfire versus ongoing prescribed burns in Waterton Lakes National Park, AB. The core objective is to understand how reintroducing historical land-use processes, particularly through Traditional Ecological Knowledge, can enhance ecosystem resilience against modern stressors like climate change and invasive species. The study focuses on the Kenow wildfire's high-severity effects on a native-grass prairie compared to lower-severity prescribed burns, suggesting that while prescribed burning is beneficial, incorporating the full historical eco-cultural context, including the role of free-ranging bison and late-season Indigenous burning practices, is crucial for effective ecological restoration. The authors conclude that extreme disturbance is not necessarily catastrophic and that combining TEK with adaptive co-management can create landscapes more resilient to pervasive change.

This paper presents the long-term ecological effects of forest fuel and restoration treatments from the ongoing national Fire and Fire Surrogate study, analyzing data collected over approximately 20 years across four diverse sites in the Western and Eastern United States. The central goal of the original FFS study was to evaluate how mechanical treatments and prescribed fire impact forest ecosystems by reducing fire hazard, promoting desirable fire-adapted species, and improving understory diversity. Key findings reveal that the most effective treatment varies significantly by region: mechanical treatments combined with fire yielded better long-term outcomes in Western pine-dominated forests, while prescribed burning alone proved more beneficial in Eastern hardwood-dominated forests. The authors conclude that to maintain these desirable conditions and achieve long-term resilience, treatments must be adapted to the specific ecosystem and followed up with repeated applications.